Why Fiona Hill and David Holmes Impeachment Testimony Should Alarm Patriotic Americans

Two career diplomats came with plenty of factual ammunition to the impeachment inquiry of president Donald J. Trump. The factual accounts of Fiona Hill and David Holmes should sound alarms for any patriotic American who believes in the sovereignty of the United States of America. Regardless of party affiliation, should the conduct testified to by these two witnesses, as well as the others this week, if acceptable,would mean any candidate for the presidency can legally seek assistance from any country who has a preference in the candidates; and in fact, a sitting president running for re-election, can use foreign aid as a weapon to get allies and a foes alike, to interfere in the American presidential elections. How is this okay? The video below explains the dire situation that the nation is stirring at, the danger is very real.
In the fifth day of public impeachment hearings, Fiona Hill, the White House’s former top Russia adviser, and David Holmes, a top staffer at the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, told the House Intelligence Committee about their knowledge of events related to President Donald Trump's communications with President Volodymyr Zelensky and the hold placed on vital military aid. Hill urged the lawmakers not to "let domestic politics stop us from defending ourselves from the foreign powers that truly wish us harm." And she described her interactions with U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland, whose suggestion in testimony Wednesday that he didn't associate the Ukrainian company Burisma with Hunter Biden was "not credible," she said. Holmes, meanwhile, described overhearing a cellphone call between Sondland and Trump, in which he says he heard the president ask about the "investigations" in relation to Ukraine. PBS Newhour on Youtube

Comments